Obama was for the Bridge to Nowhere before he was for it.

Like I was sayin… people in glass houses…

The Obama campaign has been making a lot of noise recently about Gov. Palin’s support for the infamous bridge to nowhere before seeing the light and taking a stand against it.

The interesting thing is that both Senators Obama and Biden were for it even when given a chance to shift the funds from the bridge to Katrina relief.  Why on earth would the Obama campaign be pushing this story when they can be tied to being for it and even voted to keep it when given the chance to move the funds to help the victims of hurricane Katrina?

Given that most of the media won’t put this information out there, I believe that the Obama campaign believes that they won’t be called on it.  It will be interesting to see what the discussion happens in all the blogs.

One Response to Obama was for the Bridge to Nowhere before he was for it.

  1. scotty mack says:

    I made this same comment on a liberal post that condemned Sarah Palin for “changing her mind”” on the Ketchikan bridge. Although she originally supported the bridge, she later decided to use the funding for projects that were more important to Alaska’s infrastructure. Biden and Obama have no excuses.

    The fact is, the Obama camp has nothing at all to worry about as long as the mainstream media continues to openly support him. It will only come to light on Republican blogs, Conservative radio shows and on the only television program that shows both sides of an issue, Fox News.

Leave a comment